|
Back
Ground
The
liberalization and globalization polices has opened up vast opportunities
in the fisheries sector in India. This has also created severe competition
from other exporting countries like China, Thailand and Srilanka. The WTO
provisions have made trade more liberalized, but with attended stringent
quality controls. Thus on the one hand our fisheries sector has got more
opportunities through liberalization, on the other hand we have to face
severe external competition and to follow strict quality control measures.
In the context of these changes, Government of India announced a
comprehensive Marine Fishing Policy. In the present policy the government
seeks to bring the traditional and coastal fisherman also in to the focus
to achieve harmonized development of marine fishing. The policy also aims
at implementation of international quality regimes for food safety.
Kerala
Scenario
The
state has all the requisite natural endowment for building a strong and
vibrant fisheries economy in tune with the national strategy. They include
a stretch of coastal belt extending over 590 km, and extensive inland
water spread of around 4 lakh hectares. The exclusive economic zone lying
adjacent to Kerala coast is spread over 36000 square km, which is almost
equivalent to the land area of the state.
The
state government also formulated a fisheries policy in 2004 covering all
the areas related to the development of fisheries sector in the state. It
is intended to integrate various agencies working in the fisheries sector,
for the promotion of inland fisheries, resources conservation measures,
sea safety, welfare programme for traditional fisherman, promotion of
export, up gradation of infrastructure and implementation of quality
controls programme across value chain. Competition in the international
markets is increasing and Kerala has to cope up with the market demand.
The Sanitary and Phyto Sanitary (SPS) agreement under the WTO stipulates
standards. The state has to move towards international standards of
product hygiene in order to sustain the market share .
The
quality control programmes across the value chain have to be strictly
enforced to increase the export market share from the state. The Sanitary
and Phytosanitary agreement seems to threaten the seafood exports in the
absence of stringent quality control systems. An action plan has to be
prepared for the up gradation of quality control infrastructure. Awareness
programme about the quality standards in other countries and its
implications for export from Kerala also have to be organized.
In
this changing context, there is an increasing need to generate awareness
among the stakeholders about the various changes happening both in the
international as well as in the national context. There is also a need to
formulate appropriate strategies for facing severe competition from the
external sector. This was the broad objective of the seminar.
Objectives
-
To
discuss the status and problems of Fisheries sector in Kerala.
-
To
discuss the new international norms and rules in fisheries products
trade.
-
To
discuss the local livelihood issues in the context of trade
liberalization and globalization.
-
To
discuss the strategic options available to the stakeholders.
-
To
formulate an activity report on the various strategies to be adopted.
Moderator
for the programme was Mr.
Vivekanandan.
The
speakers for the seminar were:
Shri.
James Nedumpara, United
Nations Conference on Trade and Development
Shri.
Elias George, Secretary to Govt of Kerala.
Shri.
Sandu Joseph, Seafood Exporters Association of India.
The
seminar discussion was on major issues like.
-
Fish
that are likely to be imported into India from Thailand and other East
Asian nations are from our own sea, poached by foreign vessels.
-
The
subsidy on fuel—diesel. The price of diesel for foreign vessels is
at around Rs.11-12. The Indian subsidised diesel price for the
fishermen in the fisheries sector is around Rs.29.10 ps.
So in order to compete with global market standardisation on
the diesel price should be done.
-
All
subsidies are given to exporters only.
-
Tailand
is only 12th in the world on fish production.
But stands first on exports. India, on the other hand is 4th
is production but stands 12th position on exports.
-
Why
not India produce value added products.
What other resources are required to facilitate this.
-
Govt.
should take the initiatives and lead role in facility value addition.
-
Foreign
vessels into Indian territory should be banned.
-
They
all welcome Globalisation but it should have human angle and the
layman's problem should be addressed.
-
Azhicode
Ice Plant which is in 1 ˝ acre land in Kannur was discussed as an
example for under utilisation and mismanagement of resources.
-
Strong
arguments were that public sector ice plants which are presently
closed down could be effectively run.
-
The
fluctuation in the take price by the exporters on export quality
fishes like tiger canava, prawn, curtle fish etc. was also discussed
with great concern.
Conclusion
The
discussion ended with the strong believe that Government cannot be
expected to do everything, it is for the stakeholders in this sector to
take up the opportunities of globalisation and take advantage to their
benefit. Some of the
suggestions evolved were.
-
On
fixing a minimum support price.
-
Introduction
of trading centers in every district.
Where all the fish caught would be brought in, graded, packed
and sold of.
-
The
NGO's along with the Government agencies would evolve projects of how
to process the catch to match the export market standards.
-
IMG
in association with Matsya Bhavans would take up initiatives in
training the stakeholders to meet the challenges.
-
UNCTAD
along with Sea Food Exporters Association and MPEDA would fund for
capacity building
-
Value
added products to be exported for better market opportunities.
|